Maps
Magazine

For The People

Sajjad Ali Shah, CJ ’97 & Umar Ata Bandyal CJ ’23, is history repeating? Barrister Salahuddin Ahmed
The striking similarities between Justice Sajjad Ali Shah as a Chief Justice of Pakistan in 1997, when Nawaz Sharif was Prime minister, he and his part refused to accept supreme court orders, resulted in ousting or resignation of Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah.
ND
by News Desk

Similar anger is being portrayed by the same party, but this time PMln is not alone, PPP and rest are with them except PTI, and this time Nawaz Sharif is not the prime minister, but his brother is, and instead of Sajjad Ali Shah, Umar Ata Bandiyal is the Chief Justice. We are yet to see, what the outcome of this whole fight is going to be, whether the government is going to bend, or whether supreme court is going to bend, but we understand law and nothing else. Right now, whether there are differences among the politicians over elections, or if there are divisions in supreme court and their decisions. Whether supreme court had a jurisdiction to enforce constitutional requirement such as elections in the country or whether establishment do not want elections right now, and for any reason whether PTI or PDM agree to sit together and extend elections, or CJ Bandiyal takes a step back and agrees on doctrine of necessity. What matters is 70% of the population of the country, KPK and Punjab will be governed by illegal governments, caretaker governments cannot run on doctrine of necessity. We do not necessarily agree with opinion of expert, but we stand by the facts presented in this video. Barrister Salahuddin Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court, explains us as in detail.
Tagged:

Pakistan

voteofnoconfidence

supremecourtofpakistan